Airtel Money has formally set the pricing for its initial public offering on the London Stock Exchange at £1.96 (KSh 338) per share, establishing an equity valuation of £5.3 billion (KSh 913 billion, or approximately $7 billion) for the standalone fintech enterprise. The transaction involves the sale of 270 million existing shares valued at KSh 46.5 billion, with an over-allotment option that could expand the offered stake to 17.5 percent.The transaction marks a structural milestone for African telecom infrastructure and digital financial services. By establishing a public market price tag for a dedicated payments entity operating across 13 sub-Saharan markets, Airtel Africa is providing institutional investors with a pure-play benchmark for mobile money platforms. The move puts direct pressure on regional rivals, most notably Safaricom, whose dominant M-Pesa ecosystem remains tightly bundled within its broader telecommunications business.<h2>From Telco Feature to Financial Powerhouse</h2>The journey toward the London Stock Exchange (LSE) listing reflects a long-term corporate strategy designed to separate volatile voice and data revenue from high-margin digital financial services. Historically, mobile money operations functioned as value-added services aimed at reducing subscriber churn for parent telecom operators. Over the past decade, however, payment processing, peer-to-peer transfers, merchant settlements, and micro-credit products evolved into high-growth, high-margin lines of business that outpaced traditional cellular services.Airtel Africa laid the groundwork for this public listing by systematically ring-fencing its fintech assets across its operational footprint. Between 2021 and 2024, the parent company secured minority investments from institutional global capital, including Mastercard, TPG’s The Rise Fund, and the Qatar Investment Authority. These early transactions valued the mobile money unit at $2.65 billion.<ad-spot></ad-spot>The subsequent ring-fencing required extensive regulatory approvals across multiple jurisdictions. In Kenya, the process aligned with the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) regulatory push for structural separation between telecommunications networks and payment service providers. The CBK’s National Payments System framework mandated distinct governance, capital adequacy, and board oversight for mobile money operations to prevent telecommunications operational risks from bleeding into financial systems.By the time Airtel Money filed its prospectus with the UK Financial Conduct Authority, the platform had expanded its active user base to 54.1 million across East, Central, and West Africa. The entity reported over $1.35 billion in annualized revenue, operating with an EBITDA margin hovering near 50 percent and carrying zero external debt on its balance sheet.<h2>The Economics of Unbundling Mobile Financial Services</h2>The $7 billion valuation achieved by Airtel Money highlights the operational divergence between telecommunications infrastructure and mobile financial networks. Traditional cellular operators face heavy capital expenditure cycles driven by 4G expansion, 5G spectrum acquisitions, and fiber backhaul deployment. These capital requirements, combined with price competition in data bundles, have compressed return on invested capital for standard mobile network operators across Africa.In contrast, mobile payment rails exhibit capital-light economics once agent networks and core transactional switching engines are established. Revenue generation shifts from selling megabytes and voice minutes to capturing transaction fees on money transfers, merchant payments, bill settlements, cross-border remittances, and micro-lending commissions.<ad-spot></ad-spot>For Airtel Money, operational performance across its primary markets—Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Zambia, and Malawi—demonstrated that transaction velocity grows faster than underlying subscriber acquisition. As user habits transition from basic cash-in/cash-out functions to digital merchant payments and app-based financial tools, average revenue per user (ARPU) expands without requiring equivalent capital expenditure in physical network infrastructure.The London listing also provides institutional investors with a targeted equity vehicle. Emerging market fund managers seeking exposure to African financial inclusion previously had to buy shares in integrated telecoms, taking on currency exposure, network maintenance costs, and voice tariff erosion alongside fintech growth. The creation of a standalone, publicly traded mobile money share class isolates the financial technology return profile.<h2>Market Share Realities and the Safaricom Comparison</h2>While the $7 billion valuation establishes Airtel Money as a heavy-hitting regional entity, the operational dynamics inside Kenya reveal a more complex competitive landscape.According to data from the Communications Authority of Kenya (CAK), Safaricom’s M-Pesa continues to hold a dominant position in the domestic market, controlling over 90 percent of local mobile money transaction values. Airtel Money Kenya holds an 11.1 percent market share in active subscriptions, backed by a network of roughly 260,000 active agents nationwide.Despite M-Pesa’s domestic dominance, Airtel Money’s regional diversification provides it with a balanced revenue engine. While M-Pesa derives the vast majority of its earnings from Kenya, Airtel Money spreads its transactional volume across 13 countries, reducing its exposure to single-market macroeconomic shocks or localized regulatory interventions.<ad-spot></ad-spot>The standalone valuation creates an inescapable benchmark for Safaricom and its principal shareholders, Vodacom Group and the Kenyan state. Equity analysts at East African investment banks have long argued that Safaricom’s market capitalization on the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE) undervalues M-Pesa.If M-Pesa were valued on the same revenue and EBITDA multiples implied by Airtel Money’s £5.3 billion market cap, M-Pesa as an independent entity would carry an estimated market valuation exceeding $12 billion to $15 billion. Currently, that equity value remains subsumed within Safaricom PLC’s consolidated market capitalization on the NSE.Safaricom management has repeatedly evaluated the prospective unbundling of M-Pesa into a standalone holding company under CBK supervision. While regulatory structures are already largely separated internally, a full corporate spin-off and secondary listing on an international exchange would require navigating complex tax liabilities, government shareholding considerations, and shareholder approval processes. Airtel Money’s successful pricing on the LSE accelerates the strategic timeline for Safaricom to decide whether to unlock M-Pesa’s value through a similar structural public listing.<h2>Regional Remittances and Interoperability Pressures</h2>Airtel Money’s newly acquired public capital base directly targets cross-border transaction corridors within the East African Community (EAC) and the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA). Regional trade integration under the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) has accelerated demand for low-cost, real-time cross-border settlements.Historically, cross-border remittances across East Africa carried high fees, averaging between 6 and 10 percent of the transaction value when routed through traditional money transfer operators. Airtel Money used its multi-country footprint to deploy intra-network cross-border transfers at significantly lower fees, capturing substantial volume in corridors such as Kenya-Uganda, Kenya-Tanzania, and Rwanda-DRC.<ad-spot></ad-spot>With additional balance sheet strength and regulatory backing from international investors such as the International Finance Corporation (IFC), which anchored a £67.2 million stake during the pre-IPO placement, Airtel Money is positioned to expand its settlement rails. This expansion targets direct integration with regional banking switches, international card schemes, and commercial banking APIs, positioning the network as a primary switch for business-to-business (B2B) trade payments.This expansion forces a shift in competitive posture for domestic players. In Kenya, the Central Bank has pushed for mandatory interoperability across merchant till numbers and agent networks. As Airtel Money leverages its global liquidity to subsidize merchant acquisition and offer lower transaction tariffs to small and medium enterprises, Safaricom and local commercial banks are pushed to defend their fee structures and innovate in merchant loyalty programs, working capital credit, and treasury management tools.<h2>Regulatory Implications and Capital Flows</h2>The successful listing of an African digital financial service platform on a global exchange like the LSE brings heightened regulatory and governance expectations. Airtel Money must now adhere to strict UK financial conduct standards, continuous disclosure requirements, and global anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) protocols alongside local oversight from regional central banks.For regulatory authorities in East Africa, including the Central Bank of Kenya and the Bank of Uganda, the public listing of critical financial infrastructure requires rigorous macroprudential surveillance. Mobile money systems in East Africa process daily transaction volumes equivalent to a substantial fraction of national gross domestic product. The operational resilience, cybersecurity posture, and liquidity management of these networks are matters of systemic financial stability.The market reception of Airtel Money’s IPO signals that institutional capital remains active for high-performing African digital infrastructure, provided the assets exhibit clear unit economics, strong governance, and predictable regulatory alignment. As the initial trading period unfolds on the London Stock Exchange, the performance of Airtel Money shares will serve as a barometer for subsequent tech and fintech spin-offs originating from East Africa's enterprise ecosystem.

Airtel Money’s $7 Billion London Listing Forces Valuation Reckoning for East African Fintech

Kenya's National Treasury has slashed the minimum capital crypto firms need to operate legally in the country, backing down from thresholds that industry groups warned would have locked most local startups out of the market entirely. The concession, confirmed as the Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) Regulations, 2026 were gazetted on July 24, marks the clearest sign yet that sustained lobbying by the Virtual Asset Association of Kenya (VAAK) shaped the final shape of the country's crypto rulebook.Stablecoin issuers, who faced the steepest bar in the original draft, will now need a minimum paid-up capital of KES 300 million, down from the KES 500 million proposed in March. That is a 40 percent cut on the single most contentious figure in the entire framework.<h2>What Actually Changed</h2>The National Treasury published the draft VASP Regulations on March 17, setting minimum paid-up capital on a sliding scale by activity type: roughly KES 2.5 million for investment advisers up to KES 500 million for stablecoin issuers, with exchanges, wallet providers, brokers, and token-offering platforms slotted in between. Firms holding multiple licenses had to meet each threshold separately rather than pooling capital across activities.<ad-spot></ad-spot>Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi's gazetted version keeps that tiered structure but compresses it substantially in places:<ul><li>Stablecoin issuers: paid-up capital cut from KES 500 million to KES 300 million; liquid capital cut from KES 100 million to KES 60 million (or 100 percent of current liabilities for at least 30 days, whichever is higher).</li><li>Tokenization and initial coin offering platforms: paid-up capital cut from KES 200 million to just KES 10 million for tokenization businesses and KES 20 million for ICO providers, among the steepest reductions in the entire framework.</li><li>Investment advisers: no longer required to hold any paid-up or liquid capital at all, down from a KES 2.5 million draft floor, opening the category to individuals and small firms.</li><li>Wallet providers: held steady at KES 150 million paid-up capital with KES 30 million in liquid capital, unchanged from the draft.</li></ul>The annual license fee for stablecoin issuers stayed at up to KES 2 million, one of the few figures Treasury left untouched.<h2>Why VAAK Pushed Back So Hard</h2>The capital fight centered on a straightforward argument: a flat KES 500 million paid-up capital requirement, layered on top of insurance, custodian, and audit costs, would have been affordable only to large legacy financial institutions or well-capitalized foreign entrants. Early-to-mid-stage Kenyan fintechs building stablecoin or exchange products had no realistic path to that figure.VAAK chairman Peter Onyango made the case directly to Treasury during the consultation period, arguing that if Kenya wanted to attract credible global players, its paid-up capital requirements, license fees, and compliance costs all needed to be reconsidered. The association, which represents roughly 50 firms, warned separately that pricing local operators out of the regulated market would not eliminate risk. It would just push activity toward informal, peer-to-peer channels and offshore jurisdictions such as Dubai, South Africa, and Mauritius, where licensing is cheaper and faster.That argument carried particular weight because of what Kenya is simultaneously trying to fix. The country has been under Financial Action Task Force grey-list monitoring since February 2024 over gaps in its anti-money-laundering controls, and the VASP Act was drafted partly to address that. A licensing regime so expensive that it drives transactions back into unregulated, cash-based, or peer-to-peer markets would work against the very AML oversight the framework exists to deliver. Regulators had less room than they might otherwise have to defend a number that risked achieving the opposite of its purpose.<h2>The Rest of the Framework Stays Largely Intact</h2>Outside the capital figures, the substance of the VASP Regulations has not moved. The Central Bank of Kenya continues to supervise stablecoin issuers and virtual-asset-to-fiat conversion, while the Capital Markets Authority regulates exchanges, token issuance platforms, and tokenization activity — a split that traces back to the VASP Act, which President William Ruto signed into law in October 2025.<ad-spot></ad-spot>Stablecoin issuers still face the framework's most demanding operational rules. They must hold at least 30 percent of customer funds in segregated accounts at commercial banks domiciled in Kenya, with the remaining 70 percent restricted to highly liquid, low-risk instruments such as short-term government securities. Capital obtained through loans or internal revaluations still does not count toward the paid-up capital requirement; only fully paid, unencumbered cash qualifies. Firms licensed for more than one activity, such as running both an exchange and a custodial wallet, still cannot pool capital across categories — each license carries its own separate requirement, now just a smaller one in several cases.Ownership limits and governance requirements also carry through from the draft. No single shareholder or voting bloc can hold more than a third of an exchange, stablecoin issuer, or wallet provider's shares or voting rights without regulatory approval, a guardrail against concentrated control by individual founders. Licensed firms must maintain functioning governance frameworks, conduct customer due diligence, retain transaction records for at least seven years, and submit to ongoing regulatory reporting and cybersecurity requirements.With the regulations now gazetted under Legal Notice No. 134, CBK and CMA can begin accepting license applications, something neither regulator could do while the rules remained in draft. The CBK started building internal capacity for this in April, advertising licensing, product-approval, and compliance roles specifically for virtual asset oversight.Existing operators face a transitional deadline of November 4, 2026, to bring their businesses into compliance or exit the market. For a sector processing an estimated $19 billion in crypto inflows through Kenya between mid-2024 and mid-2025 — placing the country second in East Africa by transaction value — the capital cut widens the pool of firms that can plausibly clear that deadline while staying onshore. Whether it's enough to keep mid-sized Kenyan fintechs from relocating to friendlier jurisdictions will become clear only once licensing actually opens and firms start filing.

Treasury Cuts Capital Requirements for Crypto Firms by Up to 40% After Industry Pressure

Kenyan businesses that trade internationally have long faced the same bottleneck: to pay a supplier abroad, they first need US dollars, and dollars in the local banking system are often scarce, rationed, or expensive to access. Digital asset infrastructure provider SCRYPT has now built a direct bridge around that problem, launching a licensed settlement corridor that converts Kenyan shillings straight into stablecoins, and back, without a dollar detour in between.The expansion, announced this month, covers four East African currencies: the Kenyan shilling, Tanzanian shilling, Rwandan franc, and Ugandan shilling. It matters right now because it lands just as Kenya is close to finalizing its own legal framework for crypto firms, giving businesses a regulated on-ramp at the same moment the rules for using it are taking shape.<h2>What Problem Is This Actually Solving</h2>Businesses paying international suppliers from Kenya typically move through two conversions: shillings into dollars, then dollars into whatever settlement asset the transaction requires. Each step adds a spread, a delay, and exposure to a banking system where dollar liquidity is often constrained.<ad-spot></ad-spot>SCRYPT chief executive Norman Wooding described stablecoin adoption in Africa as driven by economic need rather than speculation, arguing that businesses on the continent are primarily trying to pay suppliers and manage treasury without losing margin to a banking system that rations dollars. The company's Markets and Trading managing director, Gabriel Titopoulos, put the old process bluntly: reaching stablecoins from local African currencies used to mean buying scarce dollars first and absorbing several layers of conversion costs along the way.The new corridor removes that intermediate step. A business converts shillings directly into a stablecoin in a single licensed transaction, and vice versa, cutting out the dollar-sourcing stage entirely.<h2>How the Corridor Actually Works</h2>SCRYPT is not launching a standalone product. The KES corridor runs on the same full-stack infrastructure that its existing clients already use for trading, custody, and treasury operations, meaning banks, payment providers, and corporate treasury teams access it through systems many of them already have in place.That matters for adoption speed. Rather than onboarding onto a separate crypto platform, institutions can plug the settlement corridor into infrastructure they already trust, which lowers the operational lift of using it for live cross-border payments.<h2>Why Kenya Specifically, Right Now</h2>The timing lines up with Kenya's own regulatory momentum. In April 2026, the National Treasury wrapped up public consultation on its draft Virtual Asset Service Providers regulations, the rules that will operationalize the country's 2025 VASP Act. Those draft rules set licensing requirements, capital thresholds, governance standards, and anti-money laundering obligations for firms handling cryptocurrencies, tokenized assets, and stablecoins.<ad-spot></ad-spot>Kenya has also already built practical rails for this kind of activity. The country's VASP framework is designed to let licensed stablecoin operators integrate with domestic payment systems, including M-Pesa and commercial banks, rather than operate as a walled-off crypto product. That is part of why Kenya keeps attracting stablecoin infrastructure plays: the legal groundwork and the payment integration points are being built in parallel, not sequentially.<h2>Who Else Is Building in This Space</h2>SCRYPT is entering a Kenyan stablecoin market that is already active rather than empty. Yellow Card was the first fintech in Kenya to launch PayPal USD, and Kotani Pay has built an API-based settlement service aimed at businesses rather than consumer wallets. Telcoin, a US state-chartered digital bank, has floated plans for an electronic Kenyan shilling stablecoin of its own, intended to plug into the same mobile wallet infrastructure Kenyans already use for M-Pesa. Newer entrants like travel-focused stablecoin startup Timon have also expanded into Nairobi this year, betting on B2B cross-border settlement as a growth driver.What sets SCRYPT's move apart is that it is explicitly infrastructure aimed at institutions, banks, payment providers, and corporate treasuries, rather than a consumer-facing wallet or card. It competes less with apps Kenyans use directly and more with the correspondent banking relationships those apps and businesses currently rely on to move money across borders.<h2>What This Means for Kenyan Businesses</h2>For a Kenyan importer or exporter, the practical shift is speed and cost. Cross-border payments that once depended on correspondent banking, often slow and layered with fees, can settle through a licensed digital corridor in something closer to real time. That should matter most to small and mid-sized businesses that lack the scale to negotiate favorable forex terms with banks and have historically absorbed the widest spreads.<ad-spot></ad-spot>It also raises the stakes on Kenya finalizing its VASP regulations well. Infrastructure like this only delivers on its promise of "licensed, fair-rate dollar access" if the licensing regime itself is clear, enforced, and trusted by the banks and payment providers SCRYPT is courting as clients. The corridor is live. Whether it becomes standard practice for Kenyan trade payments will depend on how quickly local institutions adopt it, and how confidently Kenya's regulators finish the rules governing who gets to offer it.

SCRYPT Brings Direct Shilling-to-Stablecoin Settlement to Kenya

When East Africa's largest bank by assets calls its own general meeting and hands out KSh 22.5 billion to shareholders in a single year, it deserves more than a passing headline. That is exactly what KCB Group Plc did on May 22, 2026, when shareholders at the Annual General Meeting (AGM) officially approved the largest dividend payout in the bank's history — a payout that represents a 133 percent jump in per-share returns compared to the year before.This is not just a story about a bank writing big cheques. It is a story about a deliberate, multi-year transformation — from a Kenya-focused lender weighed down by a troubled subsidiary to a regionally diversified financial powerhouse with digital lending as its fastest-growing engine. Understanding the dividend means understanding the journey that produced it.<h2>The Dividend: What Was Approved and What It Means</h2>The KSh 22.5 billion payout approved at the AGM covers the financial year ended December 31, 2025. It is structured in two parts. The first is an interim and special dividend of KSh 4.00 per share, which the KCB Board approved back in November 2025. The second is a final and special dividend of KSh 3.00 per share, approved by shareholders at the AGM. Together, they bring the full-year total to KSh 7.00 per share.<ad-spot></ad-spot>To appreciate the scale of this increase, consider that KCB paid out KSh 3.00 per share in total for the 2024 financial year — amounting to KSh 9.6 billion. In 2025, that figure more than doubled to KSh 7.00 per share and KSh 22.5 billion in total. That is a 133 percent increase in per-share dividends in just one year.The final portion of the dividend was paid on or around May 22, 2026, to shareholders who were on the register of members as of April 2, 2026. Payment was made net of withholding tax, as is standard practice for Kenyan listed companies.KCB Group Chairman Dr. Joseph Kinyua set the tone at the AGM: "The payout reaffirms the Group's strong financial performance, resilient balance sheet, and commitment to delivering sustainable shareholder value. As we look ahead to 2026, we remain cautiously optimistic about the outlook."Cautious optimism is probably the right framing. The operating environment across East Africa remains complex — rate cuts by regional regulators have compressed net interest margins, global trade tensions continue to create uncertainty, and non-performing loans remain elevated. But the bank's underlying performance tells a story of a business that has learned to grow through those headwinds rather than wait for them to clear.<h2>The Profit Machine: KSh 68.4 Billion in Net Profit</h2>The dividend is a function of one key number: KCB Group posted a record net profit after tax of KSh 68.4 billion for the full year 2025, an 11 percent increase from the previous year. This is the highest profit ever recorded by the Group and came alongside a 9 percent expansion in total assets to KSh 2.1 trillion — cementing KCB's position as the largest banking group in East Africa by assets.A few other numbers round out the picture. Total revenues grew 4 percent to KSh 211.8 billion. Customer deposits climbed 15 percent to KSh 1.6 trillion, signalling strong customer confidence. The loan book reached KSh 1.59 trillion, up 15 percent. Earnings per share rose to KSh 20.80, while return on equity hit 22.5 percent — a solid figure for a bank operating across seven markets with varying economic conditions.<ad-spot></ad-spot>Perhaps most importantly from an efficiency standpoint, KCB's cost-to-income ratio dropped to 42.3 percent in 2025, down from 45.4 percent the previous year. In banking, this ratio matters a great deal: a lower number means the bank is generating more revenue for every shilling it spends on running its operations. That improvement did not happen by accident — it was the result of deliberate cost discipline applied across the Group even as revenues grew.KCB Group CEO Paul Russo put it plainly during the results announcement: "Our 2025 performance reflects the strength of the KCB franchise, the resilience of our regional footprint, and the continued trust that customers place in us. Despite a challenging operating environment, we delivered solid growth driven by disciplined execution, continued investment in digital innovation, and our unwavering commitment to supporting sector-focused lending that catalyzes economic transformation across the region."<h2>The Digital Engine: KSh 1.5 Billion in Mobile Loans Every Single Day</h2>If one number captures the sheer scale of KCB's digital transformation in 2025, it is this: the bank was disbursing an average of KSh 1.5 billion in mobile loans every single day. Over the full year, mobile lending volumes reached KSh 544 billion — a 30 percent surge from the prior year.That growth was driven by a combination of enhanced credit limits, the rollout of new digital loan products, and increasingly sophisticated credit scoring models that allow the bank to price and approve loans at speed. The lender also carried out bi-monthly credit limit reviews for flagship products like the KCB Mobile Loan and Salary Advance Loan, ensuring that eligible customers could access larger amounts over time.The digital shift goes beyond lending. KCB processed 1.6 billion transactions in 2025, with 99 percent of all customer transactions completed through digital platforms. That figure (99 percent) represents an almost complete migration of day-to-day banking from branches to mobile and online channels. The volume of digital interactions grew by 21 percent year on year. The bank also launched a revamped, unified mobile banking app in 2025 with enhanced features and improved security, designed to give customers a seamless experience across the Group's various markets.This digital leadership is not just a customer experience story. It is a cost story too. Processing transactions digitally at scale is significantly cheaper than doing so through physical infrastructure, and that efficiency feeds directly into the improving cost-to-income ratio discussed earlier.<h2>Regional Expansion: Building a Multi-Market Powerhouse</h2>KCB operates across seven markets — Kenya, Rwanda, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Uganda, Tanzania, Burundi, and South Sudan. In 2025, its regional subsidiaries outside Kenya contributed approximately 30.7 percent of profit before tax and accounted for 30.5 percent of the Group's total balance sheet.That regional diversification is a deliberate hedge. By spreading operations across multiple economies, KCB can absorb shocks in any one market while continuing to grow in others. The DRC, through Trust Merchant Bank (TMB), which KCB acquired an 85 percent stake in back in December 2022, has become a standout regional earner. Rwanda's BPR, where KCB holds roughly 77 percent following its acquisition and merger of Banque Populaire du Rwanda, has also been a steady contributor.<ad-spot></ad-spot>In 2025, the Group also turned its attention to Tanzania, a market where it had previously struggled to build market share. KCB currently ranks around tenth in Tanzania by assets and has been investing to break into the top tier of that market. With capital freed up from the sale of the National Bank of Kenya (NBK), the Group earmarked up to KSh 4 billion to inject into its Tanzanian unit to give it the capital headroom needed for growth.The strategic goal is clear: KCB wants its regional subsidiaries to start contributing dividends upward to the Group, reducing dependence on Kenya operations and creating a more self-sustaining regional financial ecosystem. CFO Lawrence Kimathi has indicated that this is a deliberate push that will improve the Group's overall payout capacity over time.<h2>The Strategic Pivot: Exiting NBK and Going Deep on Digital Finance</h2>The year 2025 also marked a pivotal strategic reset for KCB. The Group completed the long-anticipated sale of National Bank of Kenya (NBK) to Nigeria's Access Bank in May 2025. The deal, valued at approximately KSh 13.2 billion, closed a multi-year restructuring cycle that had weighed on the Group's performance — NBK had been a persistent source of non-performing loans and provisioning costs. Offloading it freed up capital for redeployment into higher-growth areas.Where did that capital go? Largely into the digital finance ecosystem. In March 2025, KCB acquired a 75 percent stake in Riverbank Solutions for approximately KSh 2 billion. Riverbank is a fintech company that provides core digital infrastructure — agency banking platforms, ERP systems, and social payment solutions — across Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda. It had actually worked with KCB since 2013 on agency banking, so the acquisition was a deepening of an established relationship rather than a blind leap.Then in October 2025, KCB announced an agreement to acquire a minority stake in Pesapal, a regional payments startup that currently processes approximately 12 million transactions monthly for thousands of businesses across the region. The Pesapal deal was still awaiting Central Bank of Kenya approval at the time of writing, but the strategic logic is compelling: Riverbank handles the backend infrastructure for digital payments, while Pesapal provides the merchant-facing acceptance network. Together, they give KCB a fuller technology stack spanning payment collection, settlement, analytics, and embedded credit for small and medium-sized businesses.The vision is that a merchant could sign up for a Pesapal terminal, have their transaction patterns observed through the platform, and receive tailored credit products from KCB — with repayments automatically deducted from daily sales. It is the kind of integrated financial services model that has worked well in markets like China and is increasingly being tested across Africa.CEO Paul Russo articulated the rationale clearly: "Across the region, payments are expected to have the fastest growth, suggesting an opportunity to innovate." The Group is essentially trying to own the payments layer of East African commerce, using it as a gateway to broader financial services.<h2>Sustainability and ESG: Green Finance at Scale</h2>KCB's 2025 performance was not purely about profitability. The Group also made notable progress on its environmental and social commitments. During the year, the bank screened KSh 587.8 billion in loans under its Environmental and Social Diligence (ESDD) framework and disbursed KSh 48.8 billion in green loans.To support its green finance ambitions, KCB secured significant international funding in 2025: a USD 100 million Tier II capital facility from British International Investment and a USD 150 million financing package from the African Development Bank specifically to support green finance and trade. These facilities not only provide capital but also signal the confidence that major development finance institutions have in KCB's governance and strategic direction.Through the KCB Foundation, the Group supported over 265,000 jobs through livelihood programmes and provided scholarships to 4,261 students from disadvantaged backgrounds. These numbers reflect an institution that understands its responsibility extends beyond returns to shareholders.<h2>What 2026 Looks Like: Momentum Continues</h2>The strong 2025 performance has carried forward into 2026. For the first quarter of 2026, KCB Group recorded a pre-tax profit of KSh 24.4 billion, a 15.3 percent increase from KSh 21.2 billion in Q1 2025. Net profit for the quarter reached KSh 17.81 billion, up 10.7 percent from KSh 16.09 billion in the same period last year.Total operating income for Q1 2026 grew 8.5 percent to KSh 53.6 billion, driven largely by growth in interest-bearing assets — even as net interest margins came under pressure from regulatory rate cuts across the region. The Group's balance sheet closed the quarter at KSh 2.3 trillion, a 10.8 percent expansion. Customer deposits reached KSh 1.7 trillion, up 15.7 percent.One of the most encouraging signals from Q1 2026 was the continued improvement in asset quality. The Non-Performing Loan (NPL) ratio dropped to 16.6 percent, down from 19.3 percent in Q1 2025 — a significant improvement driven by aggressive recovery campaigns and a 9.1 percent growth in the gross loan book. The Group has set a target of reducing the NPL ratio to between 14 and 16 percent, which would be a meaningful step toward bringing it closer to industry best practice.Non-funded income also grew in Q1 2026, rising 8.3 percent to KSh 17 billion, bolstered by transaction volumes on digital lending channels and foreign exchange trading income.<ad-spot></ad-spot>The Group's forward-looking priorities include driving performance in high-growth segments, continued investment in digital infrastructure, deepening regional market positions, and maintaining the sustainable dividend policy that delivered the historic 2025 payout.<h2>Why This Payout Matters Beyond the Balance Sheet</h2>A KSh 22.5 billion dividend payout is, on one level, a reward for shareholders who stayed patient through KCB's difficult years of NBK-related write-downs, rising NPLs, and the turbulence of operating across conflict-affected markets like South Sudan and eastern DRC. The 133 percent increase in per-share dividends represents a significant return of value.But on a broader level, this payout signals something important about the direction of East African banking. KCB's record profit was built on three things: digital credit at massive scale, regional diversification, and disciplined cost management. These are replicable ingredients — and other banks in the region are watching closely and pursuing their own versions of the same playbook.For Kenya's capital markets, a bank generating KSh 68.4 billion in profit and distributing KSh 22.5 billion of it to shareholders adds depth and credibility to the Nairobi Securities Exchange as an investment destination. It also validates the long-held argument that Africa's banking sector, when well-managed, can generate returns that rival any emerging market globally.There is still work to be done. The NPL ratio, while improving, remains high by international standards. Regional markets like South Sudan and Burundi carry political and security risks that are difficult to model. Regulatory rate cuts across the region are compressing margins. And the Pesapal acquisition, while strategically sound, still needs to prove itself operationally before it adds meaningful revenue.But the trajectory is clear. KCB Group in 2025 looked like a bank that had figured out what it wants to be — a digitally-led, regionally-diversified financial institution that serves businesses and individuals across East Africa at scale, from mobile loans to green finance to merchant payments. The KSh 22.5 billion dividend is the most direct expression of how that vision is paying off.

KCB's Historic Payout: How Record Profits and a Bold Digital Strategy Earned Shareholders KSh 22.5 Billion

Kenya has built a reputation as Africa's fintech capital, and for good reason. Since M-Pesa transformed how ordinary Kenyans moved money starting in 2007, the country has never looked back. Today, the next frontier of that financial revolution plays out on millions of phone screens every day, in the form of digital lending apps that promise instant cash with nothing more than a few taps. For Kenya's small business owners, from the market vendor restocking tomatoes at dawn to the small electronics shop owner chasing inventory, these apps have become a financial lifeline. But they are also, increasingly, a trap.The story of digital lending in Kenya is a story of two realities existing side by side: genuine financial empowerment and devastating debt cycles. To understand either side fully, you have to look at the numbers, listen to the stories, and ask hard questions about who is really benefiting from the explosion of mobile credit.<h2>A Market That Has Exploded</h2>The scale of Kenya's digital lending ecosystem is staggering. As of April 2026, the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) has licensed 227 Digital Credit Providers (DCPs), following a fresh batch of 32 new approvals announced on April 14, 2026. To put that in perspective, the CBK has received over 800 applications since it began accepting them in March 2022, meaning only about 28 percent of applicants have cleared its multi-stage vetting process so far.<ad-spot></ad-spot>The lending volumes reflect just how deeply embedded digital credit has become in everyday Kenyan life. Outstanding loans from licensed DCPs stood at KSh 28.9 billion in 2023. By December 2024, that figure had more than doubled to KSh 55 billion. By November 2025, it had nearly doubled again to KSh 109.8 billion. As of February 2026, the portfolio had climbed further to KSh 133.5 billion, with borrower numbers rising from 6.6 million to 7.5 million in just three months. These are not small numbers.The products on offer range from short-term personal loans to school fee financing, business credit, and asset-backed lending. They are delivered through mobile apps, USSD platforms, and websites, most of them disbursing funds directly to an M-Pesa account within minutes of application. For a country where only about 24 percent of Kenyans set aside emergency savings, according to a study by <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://enwealth.co.ke/training/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2023/09/Enwealth-Conversations-Report-7th-Edition-SAVING-CULTURE.pdf">Enwealth Financial Services </a>and Strathmore University's Social Security Study Group, the appeal is obvious.<h2>The Positive Edge: Real Liquidity for Real Businesses</h2>For Kenya's micro and small enterprises, access to credit has historically been one of the biggest barriers to growth. Traditional banks require collateral, audited financial statements, and weeks of processing time. A small-scale market vendor operating on thin daily margins simply cannot meet those requirements. Digital lenders changed that equation entirely.<ad-spot></ad-spot>Research supports the genuine value that digital credit delivers when used well. A peer-reviewed study published in the journal Financial Innovation found that local digital lending development reduces the probability of food and health deprivation, with rural communities benefiting even more than urban ones. The mechanism is straightforward: when a small business faces an unexpected cash crunch, the ability to borrow quickly and restock inventory can mean the difference between staying open and shutting down for the day.The GeoPoll survey commissioned by the Digital Lenders Association of Kenya captured something important about borrower motivations. Among over 4,000 respondents who had taken a mobile loan in the past six months, satisfaction levels were notably high. The study also found that 71 percent of respondents reached had taken out a mobile loan in the prior six months, underlining how normalized digital borrowing has become. The most common uses include bridging cash flow gaps, restocking business inventory, and covering emergencies.Platforms like Pezesha, founded in 2016, have tried to channel this energy productively by connecting small and medium-sized businesses to working capital through a network of banks, microfinance institutions, and other partners. Kopo Kopo, one of the more established names in the latest CBK licensing batch, has long offered merchant cash advances to small businesses, advancing lump sums against M-Pesa transaction history and recovering repayments as a daily percentage of sales. That model aligns repayment with actual business performance, which is a meaningfully more humane approach than fixed short-term loans.The broader point is that digital credit has achieved something traditional finance never managed: it brought credit access to millions of Kenyans who were previously shut out entirely. Mobile money platforms increased financial inclusion by over 50 percent, and digital lending has been a significant part of that shift.<h2>The Negative Edge: When the Numbers Turn Against You</h2>Here is where the story gets complicated. The same speed and accessibility that makes digital lending attractive also strips away the friction that might otherwise make a borrower pause before taking on expensive debt.The interest rates charged by many digital lenders are extraordinary by any standard. While the CBK reduced its benchmark Central Bank Rate to 8.75 percent in February 2026, marking its tenth consecutive rate cut, and average commercial bank lending rates fell to 14.78 percent as of that same month, digital lenders operate on an entirely different pricing structure. When annualized, interest rates on digital loans frequently range from 100 to 300 percent, and some research documents effective annual percentage rates exceeding 400 percent when hidden fees and penalties are factored in.<ad-spot></ad-spot>To translate that into concrete terms: a KSh 3,000 loan from a typical digital app can balloon into a KSh 6,000 repayment within weeks. A small grocery shop owner who borrows to restock shelves may find that by the time the loan matures, the profit generated by that extra inventory has been entirely consumed by the cost of borrowing. The math is brutal for anyone operating on thin margins.The interest rate problem is compounded by the structure of the loans themselves. Most digital loans carry repayment periods of 14 to 30 days. If a borrower cannot repay in full within that window, the penalties are aggressive. This is where the debt cycle begins. A borrower takes a loan from one app, cannot repay by the deadline, and borrows from a second app to pay off the first. Then a third to pay off the second. The cycle spirals. As one widely reported account captures it: a market vendor borrowed KSh 3,000 to restock, could not repay a month later, and found herself juggling multiple apps while fielding harassment calls. Her experience is not unusual. It is typical.Data from the post-COVID period tells the scale of the problem clearly. According to the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.knbs.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/2021-Finaccess-Household-Survey-Report.pdf">FinAccess Household Survey 2021</a>, while the average default rate across all borrowers in Kenya was 10.7 percent, the default rate for mobile-based loan borrowers had reached 50.9 percent. Nearly half of all digital borrowers were in default. That is not a marginal problem at the edges of the system. It is a structural failure at the heart of the model.<h2>Predatory Practices: Beyond the Interest Rate</h2>The financial harm of excessive interest is only part of the picture. Many digital lenders have employed tactics that go well beyond aggressive pricing.Debt shaming has been widely documented. Lenders have contacted borrowers' friends, family members, and employers to announce unpaid debts, a practice that violates personal dignity and, in Kenya's social context, can cause real reputational and psychological harm. Lenders like OKash and Branch reportedly engaged in public shaming of debtors by texting their contacts, according to research from the Center for Financial Inclusion. The Consumer Authority of Kenya (CAK) reported a 28 percent increase in consumer complaints against digital lenders in 2025 compared to 2024, and over half of the complaints filed with the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner in 2025 involved lenders misusing personal data for debt collection or marketing purposes.Before regulation arrived, the situation was even more chaotic. Hundreds of mobile lending apps operated without licensing, accountability, or any consumer protection obligations. Fees were buried in opaque terms and conditions. Borrowers were reported to Credit Reference Bureaus for loans smaller than ten US dollars. Millions of Kenyans, many of them micro-entrepreneurs, found their credit scores destroyed by debts they had already repaid or could not afford in the first place.The structural reality is that these lenders are not designed to help small businesses grow. They are designed to generate maximum returns from high-frequency, short-duration borrowing. When a micro-merchant borrows repeatedly at triple-digit rates to keep their business liquid, they are effectively subsidizing a lending model that extracts value from the very economic activity it claims to enable.<h2>The Regulatory Response: Kenya Fights Back</h2>Kenya's regulators, lawmakers, and the National Treasury have recognized that the digital lending market, left to its own devices, was generating more harm than good for the most vulnerable borrowers.The CBK began formally regulating digital lenders in 2022 following years of consumer complaints over opaque fees, data misuse, and aggressive debt recovery. The licensing framework requires all Non-Deposit Taking Credit Providers (NDTCPs) to meet eligibility requirements, governance standards, operational rules, and consumer protection obligations. The phased licensing approach has been described as a deliberate clean-up of the digital credit ecosystem, not just a rubber stamp for any applicant.<ad-spot></ad-spot>In February 2026, National Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi appeared before the Senate to outline a raft of new regulatory measures. The Treasury is moving to introduce new licensing rules under the proposed Business Laws (Amendment) Act, 2024, with the framework targeting large lenders that control most of the market. The reforms are designed to strengthen oversight while easing requirements for smaller, lower-risk operators.A parallel legislative push has gained traction in Parliament. A parliamentary petition is seeking amendments to cap loan rates and enhance enforcement of the Consumer Protection Act. The 2025 Business Laws (Amendment) Bill moved to ban harassment in debt recovery for microfinance lenders. The Finance Bill 2025 proposed a 20 percent excise duty on loan interest and service fees charged by non-deposit-taking digital lenders, a measure that could raise borrowing costs further but is also intended to deter the most predatory operators.On the interest rate transparency front, Kenya launched KESONIA, the Kenya Shilling Overnight Interbank Average, as a new benchmark for variable-rate lending beginning September 2025. While this primarily affects bank lending, the direction of travel signals that the CBK wants more transparent and rational pricing across the credit market.Separately, the CBK has introduced a Risk-Based Credit Pricing Model (RBCPM) that sets a total lending rate formula based on KESONIA plus a lender-specific premium. This kind of standardization, if extended meaningfully to DCPs, could go a long way toward preventing the most extreme rate exploitation.<h2>What Needs to Change</h2>Regulation alone will not solve the problem, even if it is a necessary start. There are deeper structural shifts that Kenya's digital lending market needs.The first is genuine interest rate transparency. Borrowers, particularly those with limited financial literacy, rarely understand the true annualized cost of a digital loan. Presenting a 15 percent monthly fee as though it were a 15 percent annual rate is effectively deceptive. Every licensed DCP should be required to display the Annual Percentage Rate prominently and in plain language before any loan is confirmed.The second is loan term flexibility. The 14-to-30-day maturity structure is inherently unsuited to the cash flow realities of micro-enterprises. A market vendor or small retailer often cannot guarantee a predictable repayment date when their revenue depends on seasonal demand, weather, or economic shocks. Extending minimum loan terms and providing genuine restructuring options without punitive penalties would reduce default rates and the debt cycle problem significantly.The third is data protection enforcement. The misuse of borrowers' personal data, particularly for debt shaming tactics that expose borrowers to family and employer contacts, is a well-documented violation of Kenya's Data Protection Act 2019. The ODPC and the CAK need sufficient resources and political will to pursue enforcement actions against lenders who break these rules, not just accept complaints.The fourth is financial literacy at scale. Over a quarter of Kenyans have taken digital loans, according to a 2023 report, but many do not fully understand the repayment terms they are agreeing to. Financial literacy education through schools, churches, community organizations, and digital platforms themselves should be treated as a public health priority, not an afterthought.<h2>The Bigger Picture</h2>It is worth stepping back and acknowledging what Kenya's digital lending market has genuinely achieved. Before apps like Tala, Branch, and M-Shwari arrived, the majority of Kenya's micro-entrepreneurs had no formal credit access at all. The choice was between no credit and expensive informal credit, often from moneylenders charging even higher rates. Digital lending created a third option, and for millions of Kenyans, even an imperfect third option has been better than nothing.<ad-spot></ad-spot>The challenge is not to eliminate digital lending. It is to reshape the incentive structures so that lenders profit by helping borrowers succeed, not by trapping them in cycles of expensive short-term debt. A grocery vendor who builds a sustainable business with the help of affordable credit is a long-term customer. A vendor who is driven into default and CRB blacklisting is not.Kenya has the regulatory framework, the institutional capacity, and the political momentum to get this right. The CBK's phased licensing clean-up, the Treasury's proposed reforms, and Parliament's growing interest in consumer protection all point in the right direction. The question is whether implementation will be fast enough and firm enough to protect the millions of small business owners whose livelihoods hang in the balance.Kenya's fintech story is genuinely inspiring. But the next chapter needs to be one where the innovation serves the borrower, not just the lender.

The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Lending: How Mobile Loan Apps Are Making and Breaking Kenya's Small Businesses

The Nairobi Securities Exchange wants to reinvent itself.Speaking at an Enza Capital session during the Africa Tech Summit on February 12, NSE Chief Listing Officer Gift Kori announced that the exchange is actively exploring a dedicated technology board — a specialised segment designed specifically for venture-backed, high-growth startups that have historically found the NSE inaccessible, irrelevant, or both."We've always had this market perception that the NSE, particularly, is for blue chips," Kori said. "That only the very big companies can come here to raise capital. That's something we are deliberately trying to change."It is a compelling pitch. Kenya is widely regarded as East Africa's tech capital. Nairobi has produced Twiga Foods, Wasoko, Lipa Later, and dozens of VC-backed ventures that have collectively raised hundreds of millions of dollars. And yet, if you open the NSE trading board today, you will find Safaricom, Equity Group, East African Breweries, and British American Tobacco staring back at you. The Silicon Savannah's startups are nowhere in sight.The NSE wants to change that. The question worth asking — and one that most coverage of this announcement has not asked — is whether it can.<ad-spot></ad-spot><h2>The Ibuka Problem</h2>Before you can evaluate whether a dedicated tech board is a serious plan or institutional wishful thinking, you need to understand what happened with Ibuka.In December 2018, the NSE launched Ibuka — a Swahili word meaning "to emerge" — as an incubation and acceleration programme designed to prepare small and medium enterprises for eventual listing. Companies would join the Incubator Board, undergo financial and governance restructuring, then graduate to the Accelerator Board where they would be positioned to raise capital and go public.Thirty-plus firms enrolled. The NSE projected multiple listings. Investors were cautiously optimistic.By 2024, after five years of operation, exactly one company had successfully listed through Ibuka: Homeboyz Entertainment Limited, which listed by introduction in December 2020. Listing "by introduction" means a company lists its existing shares without raising new capital — the lightest possible version of a public listing.Two of the programme's most prominent members did not just fail to list — they collapsed entirely. Tuskys Supermarket, once one of Kenya's largest retail chains serving over 10 million customers monthly, was ordered into liquidation by the High Court after accumulating debts of Ksh 20 billion. Vehicle and Equipment Leasing Limited (Vaell), described as East Africa's market leader in asset leasing, was placed under administration after defaulting on Ksh 1.1 billion in creditor obligations.Kori himself acknowledged this history directly. "While it was well intentioned," he said of Ibuka, "it did not see the success it was meant to have."That is a significant admission. And it raises an immediate question: what is structurally different about a tech board that would produce a different result?<ad-spot></ad-spot><h2>What the NSE Says Has Changed</h2>Kori's answer is regulatory. Recent reforms now allow the NSE to create sector-specific sub-boards under its two main segments — the Main Investment Market and the Growth Enterprise Market Segment (GEMS). Previously, the exchange operated under a more rigid structure that made tailored, sector-specific offerings difficult to design. The new flexibility, Kori argues, is the "icing on the cake" that makes a tech-focused board genuinely viable.The logic is that a dedicated tech board can be designed around the realities of venture-backed companies: different valuation frameworks, different profitability timelines, different disclosure requirements. Traditional listing requirements at the NSE were built for mature, cash-generating companies — not pre-profit startups whose value lies in growth trajectory and market potential rather than historical earnings.The NSE also points to liquidity as a solvable problem. Kenya's money market funds have grown substantially over the past two years, driven by rising interest rates that attracted a wave of retail savings. The exchange argues the capital is available — the challenge is mobilising it toward higher-risk, high-growth tech companies rather than Treasury bills and money market instruments.And then there is <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.techinkenya.com/articles/the-stock-market-is-now-in-your-m-pesa-how-ziidi-trader-is-democratizing-ke">Ziidi Trader. The launch of Safaricom's M-Pesa-integrated retail trading platform</a> in February 2026 has meaningfully lowered the barrier to stock market participation for a new generation of Kenyan investors. If young, digital-first investors are now buying shares from their phones, the argument goes, a tech board listing could find a receptive retail audience that did not exist five years ago.<h2>The Nigeria Warning</h2>Here is where the analysis gets uncomfortable, and where most coverage of this story has stopped short.The NSE is not the first African exchange to attempt this. In 2022, the Nigerian Exchange Group (NGX) created a dedicated technology board with the same stated intention: attract high-growth tech companies and bridge the gap between the startup ecosystem and public markets.As of today, the NGX tech board has not attracted a single listing.Analysts who have examined the Nigerian experience point to three structural problems that are not unique to Lagos. First, governance readiness gaps — most African startups, even well-funded ones, do not have the financial reporting standards, board structures, or audit trails that public market investors require. Second, valuation mismatches — the valuations that VC-backed founders carry into conversations are often built on global comparable transactions that local public market investors find difficult to underwrite. Third, IPO liquidity concerns — even if a startup lists, the fear that there will not be enough buyers to create a functional secondary market remains real.The NSE's response to this is that Kenya's liquidity situation is different from Nigeria's. That may be true. But the governance and valuation challenges are not geography-specific. They are ecosystem-specific, and the Kenyan startup ecosystem shares many of the same structural characteristics as Nigeria's when it comes to IPO readiness.<h2>The Actual Pipeline Question</h2>Perhaps the most fundamental question is the simplest one: which Kenyan startups would actually list on this board?The venture-backed companies that have raised the most capital in Kenya — Twiga Foods, Wasoko, Lipa Later, the Wave-era fintechs — have raised primarily from international VCs whose preferred exit routes are trade sales or listings on offshore markets like the London Stock Exchange or NASDAQ, not the NSE. Their cap tables are structured for global liquidity events, not domestic ones.The companies that might be genuinely interested in an NSE tech listing are those that are too locally focused or too early-stage to attract offshore interest — but these are also the companies that face the steepest governance and audit readiness gaps.This is not an argument that the NSE's plan is impossible. It is an argument that the plan requires a clearer answer to a specific question: who is the first listing going to be, and what does their readiness look like today?Ibuka never answered that question convincingly, which is part of why it stalled. A tech board that launches without a credible anchor listing in the pipeline will face the same outcome.<ad-spot></ad-spot><h2>Why It Still Matters</h2>None of this means the NSE is wrong to try. The gap between Kenya's startup ecosystem and its public markets is real, consequential, and overdue for a fix.African investors who want exposure to the continent's tech growth currently have no good option on local exchanges. They are either buying Safaricom — which is a telco that happens to operate a fintech — or they are sitting on the sidelines. A functioning tech board with credible listings would change that, and it would deepen the capital available to Kenyan founders in ways that benefit the entire ecosystem.The Ziidi Trader angle is also worth taking seriously. Kenya now has a growing population of retail investors who are digitally native, comfortable with risk, and actively looking for growth-oriented assets. That is a constituency that did not exist at scale when Ibuka launched in 2018. A well-marketed tech board listing could find genuine retail demand.But optimism without scepticism is not analysis. The NSE has a track record of ambitious programmes that have underdelivered. The Nigerian Exchange has a dedicated tech board sitting empty. The structural challenges — governance gaps, valuation mismatches, exit route preferences — are real and have not been publicly addressed in the announcement made at ATS.The tech board is the right idea. Whether the NSE has a credible plan to execute it is the question that remains unanswered.What would it take for you to invest in a Kenyan startup listed on the NSE? Drop your thoughts in the comments.

Fintech

Airtel Money’s $7 Billion London Listing Forces Valuation Reckoning for East African Fintech

Treasury Cuts Capital Requirements for Crypto Firms by Up to 40% After Industry Pressure

SCRYPT Brings Direct Shilling-to-Stablecoin Settlement to Kenya

KCB's Historic Payout: How Record Profits and a Bold Digital Strategy Earned Shareholders KSh 22.5 Billion

The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Lending: How Mobile Loan Apps Are Making and Breaking Kenya's Small Businesses

The NSE Wants to Be a Tech Exchange. It Has Tried This Before.

The Stock Market is Now in Your M-Pesa: How Ziidi Trader is Democratizing Kenyan Capital Markets

The "Guaranteed Win" Illusion: Inside Kenya's Betting & Forex Prediction Scams